wheel
msg:4380220 | 3:44 pm on Oct 27, 2011 (gmt 0) |
if it's a simple site, say 50 pages or so, I like wordpress. For all it's flaws, it's easy and well supported.
|
tsisson
msg:4380229 | 3:57 pm on Oct 27, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Thanks Wheel, I like WordPress as well. What if it was a bigger site, say it started out small and I wanted something that would scale, to say thousands of pages.
|
Demaestro
msg:4380231 | 4:02 pm on Oct 27, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Drupal is pretty good and scales up well, and has a lot of documentation.
Joomla may work as well but it is horribly lacking in any developer documentation so if you plan lots of core customization you will hate it.
|
tsisson
msg:4380234 | 4:10 pm on Oct 27, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Thanks for the quick replies and advice. I do plan on doing some customization so it sounds like drupal would provide the better solution for this project.
|
ergophobe
msg:4380492 | 3:03 am on Oct 28, 2011 (gmt 0) |
They'll all scale pretty well for large numbers of pages, it's the complexity of the site that makes the difference for me. I've said it a hundred times, but I won't tire of saying it: if Drupal does the job out of the box, you should probably be using Wordpress.
|
numnum
msg:4389124 | 8:00 pm on Nov 20, 2011 (gmt 0) |
| if Drupal does the job out of the box, you should probably be using Wordpress. |
|
Did you mean to say that if Drupal does NOT do the job out of the box then you should use WP?
|
wheel
msg:4389131 | 8:15 pm on Nov 20, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Nope, I think you read it right the first time.
If you don't need customization, then don't bother with Drupal - use the much more intuitive wordpress.
You'd go to Drupal only if you need something custom.
|
stephen011
msg:4398539 | 10:00 am on Dec 16, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Simply wordpress. For all it's user friendly functionality, it's easy and well supported.
Thnx
|
damon_cool
msg:4424028 | 8:22 am on Mar 2, 2012 (gmt 0) |
Drupal is better if you want custom. WP is better for end users creating content. Drupalmis my choice.
|
|
