homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Content, Writing and Copyright
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: not2easy

Content, Writing and Copyright Forum

Phony copyright claims exploit holes in U.S. Internet law
Head's up on Abuse Use

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tangor us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

Msg#: 4632309 posted 12:43 am on Dec 20, 2013 (gmt 0)

But YouTube, like many Internet companies, doesnít want to get dragged into a potentially expensive and time-consuming lawsuit over somebody elseís copyrights. So it simply took down Chevronís videos without investigating Filminís claim.


The above paragraph is cherry picked from the article which is admittedly more political than copyright... yet highlights the recent misuse and abuse of the DMCA on websites world wide. THIS IS HAPPENING.

And we as webmasters are using it as well. We do it to protect our own work and property... .but if others can come in and "claim copyright" and shut us down? Then what?

This is a discussion topic of moving forward and how to react, not politics.



WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time Top Contributors Of The Month

Msg#: 4632309 posted 1:55 am on Dec 20, 2013 (gmt 0)

Question: What happens at the other end when you file a copyright claim such as a DMCA? Is the (alleged) offender contacted and given a chance to reply, or is the site unceremoniously taken down? Or is the takedown followed by the option of an appeal?

I've only filed one DMCA in my life. All I know-- from my end-- is that someone from the domain owner's IP stopped by and looked at the relevant pages of my site. No idea what, if anything, they said to the other party before taking down the content.


WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

Msg#: 4632309 posted 7:53 pm on Jan 10, 2014 (gmt 0)

Important content should be on paid hosting. If you are a paying customer, the host will give you a chance to send a counter-notification.

You could also try hosting content outside the US. What countries laws put the person putting the content up in the strongest position? I think the EU is now giving hosts a fair degree of protection (but then UK libel laws are a problem) - anywhere better?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Content, Writing and Copyright
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved