g1smd
msg:4546610 | 10:40 pm on Feb 18, 2013 (gmt 0) |
OCR still isn't 100% reliable. If you want to do a decent job, devote some man hours to proof reading it and fixing problems.
I've recently been reading some 1960s journals redone as PDF and it was painful to say the least.
|
motorhaven
msg:4546618 | 11:03 pm on Feb 18, 2013 (gmt 0) |
Anything OCR'd will be proof-read and corrected, just not by me.
|
Leosghost
msg:4546620 | 11:31 pm on Feb 18, 2013 (gmt 0) |
DRM that defeats print screen* / copy paste etc is expensive..basically involves either java applets ..or special browsers ( for PDFs )..or specialised ebook wrappers ..
*Very few actually defeat "print screen"..even though many claim to do so..and all are platform ( OS ) dependent ..ie. they are only available and effective on windows boxen..
|
motorhaven
msg:4546624 | 11:47 pm on Feb 18, 2013 (gmt 0) |
My client doesn't have a problem with forking out the bucks for an expensive application, especially since at once point they were looking at $3000 per issue (quote from one company).
They need something less expensive than that, so forking out thousands for a software solution isn't a problem, so long as it saves them money on the per issue basis.
The proof reading of OCR'd text, we already have that lined up fairly inexpensively. Big issue here is what platform this should be OCR'd into and how to deliver it.
Also, client said up front they realize nothing is 100% going to stop copying, they simply want to stop the common copying to minimize it's appearance elsewhere on the web and also casual sharing it with others.
I should have noted this additional information in my first post. Apologies... :-)
|
Leosghost
msg:4546630 | 12:20 am on Feb 19, 2013 (gmt 0) |
Ok ..so you are looking at 3 which I know first hand that work ( there may be others / more, but these are the ones that I know defeat printscreen )..
Copysafe..
or locklizard..
or..ebookeditpro..( I run an old version of the ebookeditpro..works well for CHM type ebooks..stops print screen on all win versions..but I do not know if it still is available..their site has said "update in progress" forever.. ) ..I have heard that there is no "support" now..and that some buyers in the last two or three years have had problems either reaching "support" or receiving product paid for..YMMV
I also run some copysafe products..they work well ( they use their own browser for "secure PDFs"..the PDF reader browser is free and can be auto bundled with your secure PDFs made using the paid for product ) ..This would be my suggestion ..
Locklizard is waaay more money..I've used it ..works.. ..may well be overkill / overspend for what you need though..
I have no association with any of them..
HTH :)
|
lucy24
msg:4546639 | 1:16 am on Feb 19, 2013 (gmt 0) |
| Big issue here is what platform this should be OCR'd into |
|
Doesn't have to be platform-specific. Proofreading can even be done online. Plain text (.txt) is also platform-independent. Just make sure everyone is using the same file encoding or you will end up in a horrendous mess.
| The proof reading of OCR'd text, we already have that lined up fairly inexpensively. |
|
:: peering into crystal ball ::
Filipino readers who are accustomed to Roman script but don't know English, so they will be matching character-for-character without the brain silently correcting typos and/or scannos.
|
g1smd
msg:4546640 | 1:28 am on Feb 19, 2013 (gmt 0) |
One journal that I read from time to time, always has to issue a couple of corrections and notes in the following paper issue.
In the electronic version, someone takes the time either to apply those corrections or at the very least insert the note about what is wrong, right next to where the error is.
|
motorhaven
msg:4546776 | 2:58 pm on Feb 19, 2013 (gmt 0) |
| Doesn't have to be platform-specific. Proofreading can even be done online. Plain text (.txt) is also platform-independent. Just make sure everyone is using the same file encoding or you will end up in a horrendous mess. |
|
Since its a magazine we need a package which can scan the documents into an editable form while leaving the images intact and in the same page location as the original. Plain text files won't do.
:: peering into crystal ball ::
Filipino readers who are accustomed to Roman script but don't know English, so they will be matching character-for-character without the brain silently correcting typos and/or scannos. |
|
That's a poor assumption. The proof-reading is being handled by some local USA based college students.
|
lucy24
msg:4546928 | 10:51 pm on Feb 19, 2013 (gmt 0) |
| Since its a magazine we need a package which can scan the documents into an editable form while leaving the images intact and in the same page location as the original. |
|
And...? Look at some of the existing web-based proofreading sites like runeberg.
| The proof-reading is being handled by some local USA based college students. |
|
You'd have done better with non-English speakers. (Appearances to the contrary, US college students do not qualify.) Native speakers are the most likely not to notice simple errors like line-break duplication, or standard scannos like u:n or o:e:c.
|
|
