| 6:06 am on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I'm seeing the new home page now. I'm not sure if it's necessarily better than the one before. It's less cluttered to some extent and looks cleaner.
| 9:22 am on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Finally Twitter can start making money...
| 9:32 am on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Twitter's new home page is live now, and is visible when you're logged out.
It's now showing trending topics, today's trends, and this week's trends.
| 12:06 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
From the front page
|Share and discover whatâ€™s happening right now, anywhere in the world |
My first two thoughts were "no" and "why?". I mean, I could try to discover what's happening in Japan I suppose but I wouldn't be able to read a single word... i'm not Japanese.
| 12:26 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
So, I'm not a Twitterer but, just in case now's the time for me to sign-up, I check the new interface and see that I can click on a link to see what people are saying or talking about related to "Harry Potter".
I guess I still don't know how to use Twitter . . BUT I can SEE how Twitter can be used to market, promote, spam, . . . AND the new interface offers some really prime promotional real estate to target.
Sign me up!? :(
[edited by: engine at 5:54 pm (utc) on July 29, 2009]
| 12:30 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I just tried their "real time" search again. I had tested it a few months ago and found mostly spam results.
Here is my latest search for "Maytag washers":
1. Spam - some laundry company that keeps tweeting about it great service
2. Some post about maytag washer are racist, but the dryers are open-minded.
That's it. Two results. No value.
Unfortunately that is all the time most users are going to give a new search tool before moving on... They are trying to be more than a marketing tool, and I am not sure they have the data for it.
| 12:57 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Forums may be slower but at least someone is monitoring what goes on, not so for twitter I guess. I just tried the search too and I can't even write what came up.
edit: whoa, after testing out the search to see if even adult words are being filtered (they aren't) I logged into my account. Upon logging in ALL of my recent tweets are filled with adult words. I though everyone on my list had fallen off their rocker for a moment until I realized the search results are somehow stuck to my home page too.
| 4:57 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I just got this message
|Twitter is over capacity. |
Too many tweets! Please wait a moment and try again.
| 5:06 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Mod note. Please, let's not insert tweets in this thread.
| 5:09 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
To me Twitter is the MJ of the Internet. Much ado about nothing.
| 5:35 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
A cleaner look that makes twitter less forbidding.
People I talk to, like the idea but don't really understand the entire interface.
They don't grasp where to use # and @. It isn't obvious. The tutorials on the web dwell on the obvious which needs no explaination.
Common questions are left unanswered like how to I find people to follow within a category and a location; how do I unfollow people etc.
Once people get comfortable with twitter it will be as pervasive as blogs.
| 2:00 am on Jul 30, 2009 (gmt 0)|
yah they are looking to make money now...
| 3:34 am on Jul 30, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I see this as a positive sign. Now they will have to tackle problems likemaking themselves understandable to the masses. I see the redesign of the first page as a great encouragement.
| 12:24 pm on Jul 30, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I can't quite believe WebmasterWorld promoted this topic to its own home page - what is happening here?!
| 12:40 pm on Jul 30, 2009 (gmt 0)|
maximillianos, that's actually a pretty clean set of search results considering the way the #*$! folks have started spamming Twitter.
| 5:18 pm on Jul 30, 2009 (gmt 0)|
|I could try to discover what's happening in Japan I suppose but I wouldn't be able to read a single word... i'm not Japanese. |
That's right! Because there are no Americans, Canadians, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, English, South Africans, Australians, New Zealanders, Gibraltarians (need I go on?) living or working anywhere in Japan. There are no English language newspapers in Japan. It is impossible to encounter anything at all in the English language anywhere in Japan. No books. No metro signs. Nothing. Also no-one English speaking ever goes on holiday to Japan and no English language news networks ever send reporters to Japan or have correspondents based there.
Come on. You know better than that. It's the 21st century. There is information in English on the Tokyo Subway just as surely as there is information in Japanese on the London Underground. You know this. I know you know this.</offtopic>
I rather like the new Twitter front page.
Thank heavens they got rid of that "What are you doing?" - that never should have been pushed as one of the top uses of Twitter.
| 5:42 pm on Jul 30, 2009 (gmt 0)|
"I had tested it a few months ago and found mostly spam results"
That's the problem. Any niche that has money in it basically infests twitter with repetitive tweets containing links to pages. How do you fix this? Some have said by according authority to those with more followers. But that's nonsense when there are social media marketers who can get you five hundred new followers every few days for a sum.
| 4:10 am on Jul 31, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I think we have to review our definition of spam.
In twitter I am reading someone's post to a another person that I am following. He has choosen to get the post from that person by following them. Here I am talking about public messages and not direct messages.
Spam as I understand it is a commercial message that a person gets that he does not want.
It could be spam or not but can only be labeled spam by the person the message was sent to. He may chose to unfollow that person. Are the followers of that person entitled to label someone else's messages as spam?
Consider a job boards send me a job listing. I am out of work and want to get the messages. I am following #job #jobs and #hiring. For the sake of the arguement, a hundred employed people are reading my messages (following me).
Is this message spam? Or, would those people calling it spam really just be trying to control the correspondence between two people?
| 5:24 am on Jul 31, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Much ado about the next 15-minute bubble.
| 6:20 am on Jul 31, 2009 (gmt 0)|
cyril kearney, so what you're basically saying is that a person filling up twitter with endless tweets about their own urls is not spam simply others can choose to unfollow.
That sounds logical to me and I agree.
However, that still doesn't address how twitter search can make it seem less spammy to individuals who are looking for genuine tweets, versus marketing tweets.
| 1:58 pm on Jul 31, 2009 (gmt 0)|
cyril kearney, you make good points but fail to address Twitter search. At any given moment, there are a ton of bots posting spam on every trending topic with links to their sites.