homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Community Building and User Generated Content
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: rogerd

Community Building and User Generated Content Forum

Twitter's Revenue Generation Opportunities

 11:19 am on Aug 18, 2008 (gmt 0)

Twitter's Revenue Generation Opportunities [businessweek.com]
Don't be surprised to see advertising on Twitter soon. It's about the only way the service can generate revenue. But will it be enough?
Twitter's business model is starting to show. An early sign came in April, when the popular microblogging service launched in Japan and the home page for every Japanese user included a big banner ad in the top right corner.

Without real revenues, it can't survive in its existing form forever.

As Twitter users you may not want ads, but as marketers, it could be a terrific opportunity.



 2:02 pm on Aug 18, 2008 (gmt 0)

Clearly, their financial backers expect some kind of monetization. I think if users see some kind of ads as what Twitter needs to scale their service and achieve higher reliability, they will be content.

I'm not into Twitter much, but the complaints I hear from addicts are all focused on outages and reliability issues.


 11:54 am on Aug 19, 2008 (gmt 0)

The investors will definetly like to see some revenue thats why they invested into it.So there is no surprise that we will see advertising on twitter.


 4:44 pm on Aug 19, 2008 (gmt 0)

  • How will the advertisers target specific demographics (pc enthusiasts, right wing, left wing, homemakers, parents, teens, tweens)? How will they segment twitter users into narrow niche channels in order to broadcast advertising that appeals to them?

  • How will the advertising system divide discussion topics into channels (travel, health, domestic products)?

  • What kind of conversion rates do you expect from twitter users?

...thats why they invested into it.

Not necessarily from advertising. Twitter's inventor is the same guy who came up with blogger, Evan Williams [economist.com]. The product was never designed with monetization in mind. Twitter is a typical "build first figure out monetization later" project. Despite it's web 2.0 pedigree, the lack of built-in monetization is a feature that makes it resemble web 1.0 failures, and a few sucesses. Which is almost another way of saying, Build first and cash out when G/Y/M buys us.

[edited by: martinibuster at 5:16 pm (utc) on Aug. 19, 2008]


 5:15 pm on Aug 19, 2008 (gmt 0)

All of the above questions may best be answered by the next Twitter owners. :)

In the end, Twitter will most likely be sold and become a hood ornament to another service, like Gmail is to Google (GOOG) or Hotmail is to Microsoft (MSFT). The corporate buyer won't get much ad revenue, but it will pull millions of communicating consumers closer to its own business model.


 5:20 pm on Aug 19, 2008 (gmt 0)

Twitter could create an algorithm to analyze your messages and your friends' messages to target ads based on keywords. For example, if you or a lot of your friends tweet about iPhones they might send you a tweetvertisement about an iPhone app.


 5:36 pm on Aug 19, 2008 (gmt 0)

Twitter could create an algorithm to analyze your messages and your friends' messages to target ads based on keywords.

Heh! They might be late to the game. There are plenty of third party apps that have been developed that will do that for you. I've been in Protected mode so the apps are useless in scraping my Tweets from a Public Timeline. And, since I monitor my small number of Followers, I know that they are not using my Tweets from a revenue generating standpoint.

That is not to say that there are not a plethora of others monetizing the Twitter Public Timelines. Sugarrae recently found some AdSense stuff going on with Tweets and Google Cache. So, they may be trying different options. ;)


 7:09 pm on Aug 19, 2008 (gmt 0)

It was recently reported that Google expressed disappointment in MySpace's performance. FaceBook is still burning through millions [techcrunch.com]. Web 2.0 smells a lot like Web 1.0. Sorry if I don't share the enthusiasm but the champagne at this party went flat during the last dotcom bubble. I can't see a general community site being anything other than a poor advertising vehicle.

Community sites that focus on a specific niche, or have organizing channels, have better value because you can place the users in a demographic/niche bucket, something that Twitter currently does not do. Although with a few [webmasterworld.com] exceptions to that rule [webmasterworld.com], that value is still limited because the members of a focused community may not necessarily be anywhere near a buying cycle. Yet even with those limitations, a focused community site is head and shoulders a better advertising value than a general community like Twitter.

One method to monetize Twitter is to allow advertisers to target the followers of popular Twitterers. But Twitter screwed that up by limiting followers to 2,000. Oh joy.

Twitter isn't DOA or dying, but imo it's going to have to turn it's focus from simply keeping the system online to making it viable for advertisers.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Community Building and User Generated Content
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved