homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.147.248.118
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Community Building and User Generated Content
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: rogerd

Community Building and User Generated Content Forum

    
MySpace Gets Awarded $234Million Spam Payday
engine

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 2:23 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

MySpace has won a $234m (120m) legal judgement over junk messages sent to members of the social networking site.

Victory in the case was awarded to MySpace after Sanford Wallace and Walter Rines, the men behind the junk mail, failed to show up in court.

The judgement is thought to be the largest ever given against senders of unsolicited commercial e-mail.

However, anti-spam experts said MySpace had little chance of getting the cash it sought.

MySpace Gets Awarded $234Million Spam Payday [news.bbc.co.uk]

 

StoutFiles

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 2:39 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

The 234 million is obviously just for show. The case gets coverage and MySpace gets to send the message to not solicit their users.

carguy84

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 3:29 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

Ha, sweet. But good luck collecting that.

jcoronella

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 3:47 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

From what I can understand, each fake friend request cost them (the defendants) $300.

Interesting, that this extends beyond simple 'email' spam, and that the CAN-SPAM has been applied to social network requests.

I suppose if bloggers were to email themselves or their users every time a comment was made, they could apply this to fake comments. Of course, they'd have to be able to collect judgments in the Ruble, Hryvnia, Yuan, or Lev to really be effective.

Murdoch

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 4:05 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

Under the 2003 US CAN Spam law, each violation entitles MySpace to $100 (50) in damages, tripled when spam is sent "wilfully and knowingly".

Does this mean that everyone whose account was hijacked and used to send spam is also guilty and therefore required to fork over $100?

Sounds a bit over the top to me. Being the victim of a scam oftentimes costs you money but you shouldn't have to be considered a criminal for it too.

I like how the BBC actually has a picture of the guy who did it. That's classic.

purplecape

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 5:38 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

If your account was hijacked, how could you be liable? The hijacker is liable.

What I'd like to know is how much of this will be distributed to MySpace users. Assuming that it's ever collected, of course.

StoutFiles

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 6:21 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

What I'd like to know is how much of this will be distributed to MySpace users

You're kidding, right? The users will obviously get nothing, ever.

koan

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 6:37 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

Sounds a bit over the top to me.

That Sanford "Spamford" Wallace guy is a very infamous spammer with a long track record of harassing millions of people on a daily basis for many, many years. So no, it's not. Courts can take that into consideration.

incrediBILL

WebmasterWorld Administrator incredibill us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 7:16 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

Spamford Wallace is the poster boy for spammers deserving capitol punishment IMO.

Murdoch

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 7:17 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

I didn't mean over the top in terms of the actual spammer getting fined for that much, I just meant it seems a little over the top that you can get fined $100 for spamming even if you do it "unwillfully and unknowingly", such as it seems in the case where someone hijacks your account.

StoutFiles

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 7:19 pm on May 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

that you can get fined $100 for spamming even if you do it "unwillfully and unknowingly"

Yeah, it does actually. But since MySpace is the one suing, they aren't going to sue their own users so they're off the hook.

AffiliateDreamer

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3649720 posted 6:34 pm on May 15, 2008 (gmt 0)

how did they come up with the 234m figure?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Community Building and User Generated Content
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved