| This 68 message thread spans 3 pages: < < 68 ( 1 2  ) || |
|Congress to Ban Social Network Sites from Schools, Libraries|
| 7:43 pm on Jul 28, 2006 (gmt 0)|
|Web sites like Amazon.com and MySpace.com may soon be inaccessible for many people using public terminals at American schools and libraries, thanks to the U.S. House of Representatives. |
By a 410-15 vote on Thursday, politicians approved a bill that would effectively require that "chat rooms" and "social networking sites" be rendered inaccessible to minors, an age group that includes some of the Internet's most ardent users. Adults can ask for permission to access the sites.
Source: CNet [news.com.com]
| 4:09 pm on Jul 31, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I think where this bill will fall down is in the definition of "social networking". How on earth can you draw the line between that and any other sort of site? And how can you do it in real time, when forums are added to evolving sites all the time? It's a hydra-headed beast.
Do they intend to do this with a whitelist of approved sites, or some sort of blacklist? Either way, a lot will slip through the net and it will be a huge task to maintain any sort of order.
The other problem with this is the idea that user-contributed content is more timewasting than websites that provide content created by webmasters and/or edited content from groups of paid or volunteer writers. This is obviously nonsense.
| 12:06 am on Aug 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I>> think where this bill will fall down is in the definition of "social networking". How on earth can you draw the line between that and any other sort of site?
if it's that broad then we need not worry. Either ACLU or myspace lawyer will overturn this as unconstitutional.
| 1:46 am on Aug 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Kids learn the most from what they see adults do. With this, they're learning that censorship is acceptable. The controlling information and keeping it from people is acceptable. The fact that this passed overwhelmingly in the House is testimony to the sad state of the Bill of Rights in this country. Names, that it is withering away.
| 9:09 pm on Aug 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Um ... don't look now, but ... I think WebmasterWorld counts as a social network. Used by professionals to discuss real problem-solving of current jobs & technology, so it's also exactly the kind of place kids could learn from.
| 5:43 am on Aug 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
screw social networks - it prolly makes more sense to ban then from wikipedia ;)
| 7:33 am on Aug 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Actually, I think I'm going to about face and come out in favour of radical, narrow minded censorship.
Just think of the benefits:
1. The first time the G-Men come to haul off a school principle who refused to filter his school's Net access, all of a sudden he'll become "cool" to millions of teens around the US. Can you imagine it? A swarm of news cameras catchting Mr. Grabinski, principle of P.S. 451, being hauled away by faceless men in blue suits, his fist held high in defiance. His students, arms linked, swaying back and forth singing "We will overcome."
2. Students across America will come to realize just how much of a special-interest corrupted crock of (*expletive*) the Upper and Lower legislative bodies have become. When they become old enough to vote, they might actually do something about it.
3. Libraries will become cool again. At least, they will "after hours" when rogue librarians allow kids to sneak in for all night MySpace and chatroom sessions. It'll be such a "secret" and so "exclusive" that the library won't have enough computers to go around. As a result, in order to keep the kiddies from milling around outside waiting for their turn and looking suspiscious, the rogue librarians will allow them in, on the condition that they keep quiet and read a book while waiting their turn.
4, A massive resurgence in the popularity of Lynx and other text only browsers, so kids can keep on the social networks without the telltale graphics of those sites tipping off any teacher within a 50 foot radius. Opera, with it's ability to easily switch between a regular browser and text only mode, will finally win the browser wars.
Yes, I can see it all. Such a brave new world.
| 6:27 am on Aug 4, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I don't see this as a problem.
Kids in school need to remain focused on their larger issues:
1. How to get good results
2. How to get laid.
The Internet interferes with these natural activities to the point where getting laid can become seriously difficult ;)
Who in their right mind wants to chat with a stranger when there are dozens of perfectly good members of the opposite sex just waiting for you to talk to them in your classroom/year group?
Real flesh and blood will always be better than the net, a law encouraging some mischief behind the bike sheds is a good thing IMHO!
| 1:33 pm on Aug 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
This is not surprising to me, as most of K12 schools take advantage of Erate Funding (discounts on tech based on how many children at that entity participate in the school lunch program). Elected officials, and districts don't want to have any stats put out there that the majority of resources are being used on myspace, etc. That would be a great way for them to get a black eye, while also jeopardizing their funding!
<Sorry, no extended signatures.
See Terms of Service [webmasterworld.com]>
[edited by: tedster at 3:01 pm (utc) on Aug. 9, 2006]
| This 68 message thread spans 3 pages: < < 68 ( 1 2  ) |