Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 126.96.36.199 , register , free tools , login , search , pro membership , help , library , announcements , recent posts , open posts Become a Pro Member
Cloaking based on referrer Jkjk msg:4317964 2:39 pm on May 26, 2011 (gmt 0) Hello, Can I display different versions of a page based on http referrer without risking ban? What difference between the two versions would be acceptable?
incrediBILL msg:4318971 1:07 pm on May 28, 2011 (gmt 0)
Anything not deceptive to the user would be my guess, not baiting and switching content. volatilegx msg:4356867 9:46 pm on Aug 30, 2011 (gmt 0)
I've been running http_referer based cloaked page for more than a decade for a competitive area as part of a test of this very question. Result: no problems; top ranking. g1smd msg:4356883 10:18 pm on Aug 30, 2011 (gmt 0)
Be aware that many legitimate visitors do not present a referrer - the data is suppressed by some ISPs, by some "internet security" software, or by user choice (browser settings).
lucy24 msg:4356902 11:19 pm on Aug 30, 2011 (gmt 0)
That's good, isn't it? It means that the version seen by robots will also be seen by perfectly legitimate humans. If all humans had referers*, the no-referer version would only be seen by robots-- and that would be a problem. * Which they wouldn't anyway. What about bookmarks and type-ins? Those should be the visitors you love the best. phranque msg:4357048 10:03 am on Aug 31, 2011 (gmt 0)
getting slightly off-topic, but... email clients and non-browser web apps such as twitter apps won't send a referrer.