homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 184.73.52.98
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Website
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Cloaking
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Cloaking Forum

    
anti-cloaking and de-optimizing
lucy24




msg:4304883
 4:47 pm on Apr 27, 2011 (gmt 0)

Today's goofy question

:: insert boilerplate about how I'm not sure which of 4 forums was the right place to ask this one ::

Are there legitimate and law-abiding ways to "break" your own search results on purpose?

Real-life example (I have a few similar ones): I am darn sure that the people whose googlings lead them to Grandmother Puss, or the Grateful Mouse are not looking for an obscure little picture book dating from circa 1870. I would prefer not to contemplate what they are looking for. It is not a problem in any concrete sense (like bandwidth loss), but everyone would be happier if these particular visitors didn't waste time here in the first place.*

I am thinking something like a global replace of the undesirable words with
pu<span class = "invisible">cat</span>ssy
or
co<span class = "invisible">rooster</span>ck
accompanied of course with appropriate CSS.

Would this work? Obviously not with search engines that use the surface-level text, but will it fool the ones that work from the raw html? Would search engines get mad at me for doing something intended to reduce search results and visits?


* I have occasionally added content to pages when logs suggest that visitors are looking for information that isn't currently on the page. No skin off my nose, and it builds goodwill. But, well, there are limits to helpfulness.

 

enigma1




msg:4304926
 6:00 pm on Apr 27, 2011 (gmt 0)

Why don't capitalize on it, create some contacts to redirect the traffic to, with some ROI. Use some js popup asking users the purpose of their visit and let them decide.

If you break the search results you lose the traffic, where the hidden tags - despite of the noble purpose - may look as spam to SEs.

volatilegx




msg:4356871
 9:52 pm on Aug 30, 2011 (gmt 0)

If it were me, I would use some server side scripting to check the http_referer header, looking for the objectionable words in the referring URL. Usually they will appear as the "query-string" part of the search engine URL. You could redirect those visitors to the page of your choice. This would prevent your page from being penalized for the tricksy things you are contemplating with respect to the keywords for which you DO want to rank.

g1smd




msg:4356882
 10:17 pm on Aug 30, 2011 (gmt 0)

Once you grok mod_rewrite, you can do whatever the heck you like with every visitor that turns up, based on any characteristic or combination of characteristics presented in their HTTP request. :)

Staffa




msg:4356885
 10:23 pm on Aug 30, 2011 (gmt 0)

I would side with volatilegx. In fact, I do something similar on one of my sites, but for a different purpose, and it works very well for me.

lucy24




msg:4356905
 11:30 pm on Aug 30, 2011 (gmt 0)

Query strings! Woo hoo! All I have to do is read my own boilerplate. And then maybe I'll put up the e-text I haven't yet dared to post although it's got much nicer pictures. Unfortunately it is called "The Rooster, the Mouse and the Little Red Hen"-- only the book doesn't use the word "rooster". (I deliberately did use that word in all alts, just so Project Gutenberg wouldn't be inundated with misguided searches, but of course I couldn't do anything about the body text.)

Once you grok mod_rewrite

I'll come back in the year 2023 then ;)

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Cloaking
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved