homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.167.249.155
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Website Analytics - Tracking and Logging
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Receptional & mademetop

Website Analytics - Tracking and Logging Forum

    
Not Provided - Spike Starting Oct 30, 2011
pageoneresults




msg:4382508
 11:05 am on Nov 2, 2011 (gmt 0)

Anyone else noticed an increase in "Not Provided" since Sun, Oct 30, 2011? I see a substantial spike from that day forward.

 

Dijkgraaf




msg:4382785
 8:34 pm on Nov 2, 2011 (gmt 0)

Not provided in what?
In what particular tool/log/field?

pageoneresults




msg:4382795
 8:53 pm on Nov 2, 2011 (gmt 0)

Google Analytics.

I'm surprised there isn't much discussion on this one. This is above and beyond what folks have been discussing to date. There have been significant increases in "Not Provided" stats starting on Oct 30, 2011. I've had 10+ people confirm on Twitter and there are plenty of screenshots floating around depicting the increase. It is rather significant. This is not the measly increase we first saw when it was announced.

On one site I monitor, we were averaging about 500 per day. That jumped to 1,700 on Oct 31, 2011 and it then jumped to 4,200 on Nov 01, 2011 and appears it will be in the same range if not more once Nov 02, 2011 closes. Similar spikes are being seen by quite a few folks.

Example: [Twitpic.com...]

mslina2002




msg:4382803
 9:16 pm on Nov 2, 2011 (gmt 0)

I am seeing the same spike in GA too since Oct 30. It now tops the keyword list whereas before it would be in 4th or 5th spot. Looking at the data it is mostly from US.

My traffic has also decreased since Oct 30 a bit so not sure if that is Seasonal related, weather (power outage in New England) or related to G tinkering.

WillG




msg:4382939
 4:16 am on Nov 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

I am seeing this as well it is now the number one result on my site. Did I miss some kind of announcement about this?

matrix_jan




msg:4382943
 4:31 am on Nov 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

On one site I monitor, we were averaging about 500 per day. That jumped to 1,700 on Oct 31, 2011 and it then

You mean "(not provided)" traffic? or in general.
If the first then G just started not to provide referral data for SSL (logged in users) traffic.

[webmasterworld.com...]

pageoneresults




msg:4383041
 2:22 pm on Nov 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

You mean "(not provided)" traffic?


Yes, on a more significant scale than what was originally reported.

Keyword “Not Provided” By Google Spikes, Now 7-14% In Cases
[SearchEngineLand.com...]

^ I was expecting to see it reported here at WebmasterWorld first. Most appear to think I'm talking about the first SSL announcement. I'm not that far off the grid. Sheesh...

mhansen




msg:4383046
 2:30 pm on Nov 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

18% yesterday for us... Specifically the obfuscated, not provided, Google referrals.

viggen




msg:4383109
 4:58 pm on Nov 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

yes, very annoying not set and not provided make up 20%, time to remove that code?

Whitey




msg:4384783
 10:18 am on Nov 8, 2011 (gmt 0)

Not sure if it's connected, but 2 site's i monitor received dramatic spikes on 4 thru 5 Nov from [t.co...]

Everything's back to normal now - but it throws GA performance measurements out, so quite frustrating.

justgowithit




msg:4384825
 11:57 am on Nov 8, 2011 (gmt 0)

I'm not keen on flying blind.

I hit 19% yesterday. If the trend continues, I'm going to look at phasing in alternative analytics so I can compare an another solution with Google Analytics while data from the later is still largely available.

Given the lax response on this, I kind of feel like I'm over overreacting -- but in a case like this, I'd rather be safe than sorry.

Any other opinions?

justgowithit




msg:4385223
 12:46 pm on Nov 9, 2011 (gmt 0)

alternative analytics

Self correction: SSL queries of logged in users from G aren't visible to other analytics services either.

Winooski




msg:4386779
 4:27 pm on Nov 14, 2011 (gmt 0)

For some clients I've been seeing the number creep north of 20% (this for the last 7 days, i.e., 11/7 to 11/13). Not happy at all, but I think we're fairly helpless on this one...at least until Google starts getting more heat from Federal government inquiries into its monopolistic practices, at which point this issue should start getting more sunlight (i.e., "Protecting privacy? Really? Like you DON'T do for visitors clicking through paid ads?")

chewy




msg:4387567
 1:04 pm on Nov 16, 2011 (gmt 0)

I'm seeing 14% "not provided" this week, and the "not provided" is converting nicely at above averages.

I'm a bit surprised over here that there's little discussion and apparently not much concern.

chewy




msg:4387570
 1:09 pm on Nov 16, 2011 (gmt 0)

Also 9% "not provided" on a much larger site. 9% in this case is over 40K visitors. Ouch.

chewy




msg:4390665
 1:10 pm on Nov 24, 2011 (gmt 0)

So this is possibly a useful hack to get some data back.


The usual caveats apply.

I will be testing it over the long holiday weekend.

[econsultancy.com...]

Winooski




msg:4390992
 2:30 pm on Nov 25, 2011 (gmt 0)

Thanks chewy! Looking forward to hearing what you think.

chewy




msg:4391017
 3:39 pm on Nov 25, 2011 (gmt 0)

if workarounds are the best we can come up with, that is a start.

my preference is, and has always been, that we need to pressure the powers that be to give webmasters reasonable access to information over obscuring and obfuscating a small but increasing subset.

professionals with the appropriate knowledge have the ability to 'read between the lines' and see the data that is missing.

but it is a great thing to be able to say to an executive "we know x is doing y".

it is not so great to have to say "it is a reasonable and educated guess that x may be causing y to happen".

jennytoo




msg:4393172
 9:35 pm on Dec 1, 2011 (gmt 0)

We've noticed an increase in (not provided) on most of the websites we track. Even more strange though is that one of our client sites do not have even one instance of (not provided) though we do show (not set). I find it hard to believe that not one person coming to the site is logged into Google. Any ideas?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Website Analytics - Tracking and Logging
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved