homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.97.242
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Website Analytics - Tracking and Logging
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Receptional & mademetop

Website Analytics - Tracking and Logging Forum

    
Avg Time Spent on Site
u4eas

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3893392 posted 1:01 am on Apr 16, 2009 (gmt 0)

Anyone have an idea what a decent avg would be for average time spent on site?

Based off of google analytics it shows some of my sites are as low as 1.4m and as high as 5.2m while most seem to hover in the 2's and low 3's.

What ranges would be considered average and above average. To me 2-3 would seem low. But I really dont know. As I am just delving into analytics.

Thx in advance.

 

u4eas

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3893392 posted 1:48 am on Apr 16, 2009 (gmt 0)

I checked my other google analytics acct (for my most popular website) it shows that in 2005 my average time on site was 9.59m and currently is at 13.15m.

maxdomain

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3893392 posted 3:02 pm on Apr 18, 2009 (gmt 0)

mine is 7.54m

cgrantski

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3893392 posted 11:44 pm on Apr 18, 2009 (gmt 0)

If your visitors are on a mission (find or buy something or learn something specific) then your times could be interpreted as much too long. If your visitors are there to discover, learn, browse around, discuss, then I'd say your times are too short.

Your question means nothing without the context.

Digmen1

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3893392 posted 9:10 pm on Apr 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

Yes as a new on-line retailer my average times are just under 3.00 minutes. So I need to get them up quite a bit !

cgrantski

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3893392 posted 12:51 pm on Apr 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

Seems reasonable.

And, remember that "average" is a very poor statistic to use. I've never seen a site where a few incredibly long visits doesn't pull the "average" up high. You can have half your visitors spending 40 seconds or less on the site, and the "average" could still be 3 minutes.

If your stats package has a "median" visit length available, that's much closer to what most people would call "typical." In the above example, the median would be 40 seconds.

If your stats package has a report listing lengths (under 1 minute, 1-2 minutes, 2-3 minutes, etc) with the number of visits for each, you can get a much better idea of how long most visits are, and you can use that table to calculate the median.

Also, remember that the "average" may or may not include all the very short visits that are the single page visits. A single page visit has no length at all because there is no second page view to show how long the first page was viewed. If the stats package doesn't include these ultra-short visits in its calculation of "average," then your "average" is, again, far too high and nowhere near a good representation of "typical."

The e-comm sites I have experience with averaged 7 minutes, with a median of about 2.75 minutes. But, there are lots of different kinds of e-comm sites with difference ideal visit lengths.

This is about the point when somebody else should jump in and say "conversion is the only thing worth measuring."

BradleyT

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3893392 posted 2:12 pm on Apr 21, 2009 (gmt 0)

If your time on site is 2 minutes - so what?
If your time on site is 5 minutes - so what?
If your time on site is 7 minutes - so what?

Worthless metric by itself.

cgrantski

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3893392 posted 4:13 pm on Apr 21, 2009 (gmt 0)

... with "by itself" being the important part of that statement, I hope.

chewy

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3893392 posted 3:25 pm on Apr 22, 2009 (gmt 0)

Great to see this old topic come up - but in a new way.

just for fun, is it possible to easily get "median" data from Google Analytics? I've been meaning to ask this question and this is probably one of the best places to ask.

To add to the OP, it really is about "conversion" more than TOS. And conversion can be defined in many ways.

I consider TOS a leading indicator, but never authoritatively "good" unless I know that high TOS also reasonably correlates with conversion or pre-conversion behavior such as looking at a contact form, using a store locator, putting goods in a shopping basket, etc.

With one site I manage, I get a lot of high TOS visits from people just surfing for the fun of it.

Not much I can do about this - I know for a fact that many of these visitors are amateur hobbyist "dreamers" who are digging looking at the pretty pictures of professional quality equipment they may never afford.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Website Analytics - Tracking and Logging
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved