homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.227.11.45
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Website Analytics - Tracking and Logging
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Receptional & mademetop

Website Analytics - Tracking and Logging Forum

    
WebTrends or G Analytics?
tonynoriega




msg:3739358
 8:07 pm on Sep 5, 2008 (gmt 0)

I use G Analytics for most of my sites, but have a client who now uses WebTrends... i hear WT can get pretty deep and is customizable...

does anyone have any insight on the pros and cons of the two and what would cause someoene to use one over another?

i like Analytics, but dont know if this client should be dependent on G to gather their stats...

 

peterdaly




msg:3739368
 8:26 pm on Sep 5, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebTrends can be as good, or better than GA, but it requires a lot of work to build up equivalent functionality.

WebTrends can get some very deep and business specific reporting if properly setup and integrated into the WebSite by someone who knew what they were doing.

McElvoy




msg:3739479
 11:47 pm on Sep 5, 2008 (gmt 0)

A blog called Got Analytics did a two-part on Google Analytics (versus) WebTrends; try searching.

Since one is free and the other isn't, cost-benefit is probably your biggest consideration. What does the client's site do and will they make more money if they pay for analytics? (Of course, Google Analytics's labor cost should be taken into account. Google Analytics is not efficient for many purposes and you pay for it in extra hours.)

[edited by: McElvoy at 11:52 pm (utc) on Sep. 5, 2008]

peterdaly




msg:3739636
 11:31 am on Sep 6, 2008 (gmt 0)

Sounds like the client already owns WT, so price is a mute point.

seodreamer




msg:3740372
 11:15 am on Sep 8, 2008 (gmt 0)

I'd say Google analytics is pretty good for most peoples needs. Its free and easy to integrate. Also it fits nicely into AdWords if you also advertise you sites

tonynoriega




msg:3740553
 4:36 pm on Sep 8, 2008 (gmt 0)

Well what i plan to do is a cost versus need analysis. What does it cost per month (WT) versus what reporting information is needed. If all the departments want to know is how many UV's or PV's they got in the past 90 days, then its a no brainer... go with GA.

Now if they want to know something in depth like how many people registered on our site that entered a zip code of #*$!XX in the zip code field on the new registration page over the past 90 days that used FireFox as their browser... then i might need WT.

I think with the usage, demand and feedback that GA team gets, they will consistently add more features and "perks" to the application. All of their webmaster tools and such have gotten better year after year.

cgrantski




msg:3741128
 10:16 am on Sep 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Good plan. Not so sure about the assumption. Google has acquired many things and let them languish. They may be thinking this is good enough. What, really, is their incentive for improving it? Its contribution to their AdWords business (their only way of making money right now) may be maxed out.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Website Analytics - Tracking and Logging
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved