| 12:27 pm on Jan 23, 2009 (gmt 0)|
It looks pretty uncuil (it always did), but it doesn't look dead to me.
| 9:03 pm on Jan 23, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Over the past few days they've been crawling some of my sites at a greater frequency, so there's still a pulse.
| 5:10 am on Jan 30, 2009 (gmt 0)|
They still haven't fixed that ridiculous mis-matched image problem. They show my sites with images that have nothing to do with them and my images are on other listings.
| 5:48 am on Jan 30, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Cuil had one big chance and they blew it. It would take a miracle for them to get another shot.
| 11:52 pm on Mar 6, 2009 (gmt 0)|
For them to bomb something so basic as displaying at least an image from the site that was searched is pretty bad. I think they would've had a great chance of success had they worked out a few basic issues.
| 1:51 am on Mar 7, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I took another look at their SERPs. Same image mismatch problem. ZZZZZzzzzz
| 2:19 am on Mar 7, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Based on their traffic, I would say this one is well done. Very unfortunate.