Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 22.214.171.124 , register , free tools , login , search , subscribe , help , library , announcements , recent posts , open posts Subscribe and Support WebmasterWorld
phranque msg:4100225 10:50 am on Mar 18, 2010 (gmt 0)
jastra msg:4100278 12:19 pm on Mar 18, 2010 (gmt 0)
Thanks phranque. Perfect. ergophobe msg:4102652 9:56 pm on Mar 22, 2010 (gmt 0)
I don't have phranque's expertise, but I will simply say that using swfobject made integrating a swf audio/video player relatively simple and reliable. jastra msg:4102704 11:00 pm on Mar 22, 2010 (gmt 0)
We're going to use that method. Until now, I thought <noscript> was the only option. Thanks. phranque msg:4102774 2:24 am on Mar 23, 2010 (gmt 0)
as the search engines get better at indexing flash content it will be interesting to see how they treat the alternate and/or noscript content when you are using the swfobject solution. jastra msg:4102936 11:37 am on Mar 23, 2010 (gmt 0)
Do you mean that the search engines may grow to consider it suspect, a potential for shenanigans, as perhaps with hidden CSS?