cmarshall

msg:3306604 | 6:08 pm on Apr 9, 2007 (gmt 0) |
Thanks! I think there are a couple of other resources as well. I remember seeing a Java-Powered one once, but I don't have time to research it.
|
pageoneresults

msg:3308420 | 2:25 pm on Apr 11, 2007 (gmt 0) |
Be careful when downloading and installing JAWS. I went through this I believe a year ago after a similar topic arose. JAWS has a tendency to overwrite system settings in regards to display. You may have to undo some things after the install. After my previous JAWS experience, I really have a different perspective for the disabled. Man, what a nightmare that was, browsing various sites using JAWS. And then I decided to browse sites in the SEO arena. Yikes! SHUT UP!
|
Matt Probert

msg:3308626 | 6:14 pm on Apr 11, 2007 (gmt 0) |
As an alternative, you can use Lynx. It's not a screen reader, but as a character-based browser it will show you what robots will encounter and what screen readers will encounter, including those silly images where you have forgotten the alt text (eg: picturename.jpg). Matt
|
encyclo

msg:3308983 | 1:38 am on Apr 12, 2007 (gmt 0) |
Using any screenreader technology even for a short while is a revelation - it is a great way of discovering how well a site is structured - and when browsing non-visually, page structure is absolutely vital for best understanding. Lynx is a great test tool as well, as it strips down the page to the bare essentials. If your page works well in Lynx, then you have gone a long way to making it accessible via a screenreader. A hint: use VMWare or a similar virtualization program to have multiple instances of you OS available with different configurations. In that way, you can test such software without affecting your main setup.
|
ogletree

msg:3310321 | 2:51 pm on Apr 13, 2007 (gmt 0) |
I have used the last 2 versions of JAWS with no prolems. They must have fixed that problem.
|
|